In the next decade I hope that…
1. … as my kids go through their teenage years and do as many stupid things as I did that…
a) They survive and are not permanently damaged
b) I can see the context and show understanding2. … my wife and I are not grandparents by 2020
3. … the wonderful teamwork I share with my wife grows stronger still and we can channel it in some exciting new directions
4. … I get as much fulfillment and enjoyment out of my working life as I have done over the last two decades
5. … those clever genetic scientists create an injection that will give me perfect hearing again
6. … my parents celebrate 2020 New Year with me
7. … the Western world understands it debt to under-developed nations and helps them to help us safeguard our planet
8. … Web Content Management continues to thrive and prosper and evolve in many exciting new directions
9. … I will be able to wear the dinner jacket I bought in 2000 for the 2020 celebrations (because it certainly doesn’t fit for the 2010 ones 😦 )
10. … I can give up Twitter and blogging for a whole week without getting uncomfortable withdrawal symptoms
What are yours?…
Monthly Archives: December 2009
Some learning from the Noughties…
Although the rolling passage of time makes a changing year somewhat irrelevant in the greater scheme of things, the turn of a decade is a useful milestone for reflection and looking forward. My biggest learning points from the last 10 years are…
The web has exposed what we really are…
Animals. There is no better illustration of this than the herd behaviour it has facilitated on a global level, which has been a repeated pattern of the last decade – from the dotcom boom and bust to the financial bubbles to Twitter. The latter is an appropriate name for something that induces ‘flocking’ or ‘swarming’. You can almost visualise this happening as a leading influencer changes direction or swoops down on something new.
So – is this a good or bad thing? I guess it depends whether, on balance, it has done more harm than good. It’s driven growth, that’s for sure – but has it been the right sort of growth? There would appear to be an even greater gap between rich and poor and it is becoming ever clearer that we have raped and pillaged our planet more in the last ten years than at any time before. The consequences of that could well be catastrophic if you believe the growing consensus of scientific opinion.
Bill Gates is right…
Well about one thing anyway. His soundbite from The Road Ahead about people “overestimating what will happen in the next two years but underestimating what will happen in the next 10” keeps playing out. Slightly ironic I guess that the biggest example from the last decade is the mobile market. When I worked on projects at the beginning of the decade to visualise the types of services 3G technology would bring to phone users I must admit that none of them looked much like a Microsoft approach. However, I had an underlying sense that the proprietary monolith would come to dominate the mobile world, as it had the desktop.
The big lesson here is that applying thinking and approaches from one environment to a fundamentally different one – is deeply flawed. Fresh thinking is needed. And Apple demonstrated that so well with the iPhone. Design a device and applications specifically for the context in which they are used rather than trying to get a phone to behave like a desktop PC. Lessons from my time at NTL in the 90s suggest exactly the same is applicable to the web and interactivity ‘on TV’ – in a communal, lean back environment, the context and approach must be relevant and compelling. Also lessons from spending half of the last decade in IT/software development roles also suggest that continuing to apply desktop thinking to an inter-connected always-on online world is also ultimately flawed.
Tony Blair was wrong…
Well, not about everything – but certainly in ‘his’ decision to commit the UK to an ill-conceived war and extremely badly planned peace in Iraq. Although I’ve highlighted the dangers of herd behaviour in the first point, there are times when ‘the wisdom of crowds’ is right – the challenge of course is to read the situation correctly. The largest demonstration ever on the streets of London and in other capitals around the world suggested that the majority of people felt uncomfortable with the reasons for going to war – even if they didn’t physically take to the streets. I’m sure that I and many others are having our own thoughts back in 2003 confirmed as the latest enquiries expose the degree to which we were misled. It is particularly galling to remember our prime minister telling us that we didn’t see what he saw in terms of intelligence reports and therefore he had to make the decision on our behalf. There was a collective sense, more than anything I have experienced in my life, that this was wrong – I feel we had an innate understanding that we were being lied to but were ultimately powerless to stop the political machinery taking us to war. This matters deeply and it’s made me question everything I ever understood about ‘democracy’. If social media had been more prominent in the early part of the decade I’m wondering if things would still have happened in the way they did and if many hundred of thousands of innocent lives could have been saved?
There is hope…
If we can harness herd behaviour effectively in the next 5 years to help fix some of the damage we have done to our environment and promote more sustainable ways of living – then the web driven booms and busts of the Noughties will provide some consolation. But, and it’s a big but, we need to be convinced that those influencing the herd or causing the flock to change direction have thought about what they are doing and the effect such mass changed behaviour will have in the longer term.
If we can be brave enough to slow down, take a step back and look at things differently then the next decade could be full of exciting innovations that really would have the potential to change the world for the better. The challenge here is having the courage and vision to turn away from the herd and head for new pastures. I encountered the Blue Ocean Strategy a while back which, although it really is a post-justification reasoning, it does illustrate the thinking that has created some of the iconic gadgets of the last decade such as the Wii and iPhone. Perhaps a more appropriate title for this approach in the next decade would be Clean Ocean Strategy given the damage we are doing to the remaining Blue Ocean. In this, we would be looking to create new opportunities that didn’t add to the plastic, chemical and CO2 pollution that is turning our seas to an acid bath but also captured people’s imagination in the way that communications and entertainment have done in more recent years.
If we can use the technology to empower those who are repressed and discriminated against to gain a voice and learn for themselves that there are alternative ways to think and live, fundamentalism in all nations can be shown for what it is – a destructive, pseudo reality. For instance, if women had been in a stronger position in places such Afghanistan and Iraq, and likewise in the leading administrations of the Western world earlier this decade I doubt these complicated, entrenched and drawn-out wars would ever have started. Social media in its broadest sense offers the opportunities to make things more transparent expose hypocrisy and lies and amplify wisdom. Conversely, it could be manipulated unhealthily to amplify destructive forces and promote damaging herd behaviour. We have it in our power though to use it for good, rather than evil.
Let hopes rather than fears prevail in the next ten years
2020 here we come…
Think global, act global…
People have been talking about ‘Thinking global, acting local’ for almost 100 years old now although it is a phrase more associated with environmental and globalisation commentary of the late 20th century.
Globalisation has moved on a pace over the last ten years, particularly from a web and information management perspective. That original phrase has been used a lot to describe best practices for internationalisation and localisation.
Experiences in recent years, combined with a view of the bigger challenges facing our world today, highlighted particularly by the current Copenhagen meetings has led me to a different outlook – ‘Think global, act global’
To put it bluntly, I don’t think we have the luxury to ‘act local’ any more. To me, acting local seems like an indulgence that leads to inefficiency, unnecessary duplication of effort and wasted resources.
I know that the environmental movement was trying to encourage us to think beyond our borders but the world’s biggest polluters have been acting in ‘local’ interest for far too long and if they continue to do so then runaway global warming and its associated catastrophes seem increasingly certain.
The first challenge from a climate perspective is that politics on a local level is ineffective. Forcing a small country and its inhabitants to ‘act locally’ while the large developed and developing countries continue on in the same ways is hypocritical. Big problems need big global action.
One of the main thing I’ve observed in global web projects over the last few years is how similar things are from country to country as opposed to how different – even from one side of the world to the other. I’ve lost count of the number of marketing meetings I’ve attended where the talk is about how things are done very differently in this or that market, only to discover that the interests of the target market are essentially the same and the marketing approaches almost identical.
Globalisation best practice suggests centralised control with local empowerment. While this makes a lot of sense I think a lot of organisations could go further and faster with more centralised control.
Like the current debates around climate change and the need to drive forward a global agenda, I think too much local level thinking can be detrimental to global web projects. In my experience there are a lot of examples where online marketing activities in one market are direcly applicable in another and a lot of time, effort and resource can be saved reusing content and digital assets.
Information Management 10 years on…
I remember first attending the Information Management/Online Information Show, or a variation of it, at London’s Olympia back in the 90s. I haven’t attended for a few years but enjoyed my visit last week for some very selfish reasons. For a start, it was very quiet – a welcome surprise for a deafie like me – and lack of footfall in the aisles meant I had some useful conversations and demos with a number of interesting exhibitors. The seminar theatres were quite small so I was thankful for good acoustics and being able to chat with some of the presenters easily.
I have a soft-spot for this show and I like the way it attempts to bring together age-old disciplines of information management with the latest online buzz – usually with some intelligent and well reasoned views of the latter. I’m sure there are some wise and seasoned information practitioners who look on with despair at the hype cycles that have passed by over the last 10 years or so and soldier on regardless until some common sense returns to the proceedings.
Unsurprisingly, social media was on the agenda in a number of the seminar theatres. I very much enjoyed a ‘pitfalls’ presentation by Sam Marshall from Clearbox Consulting a guy who has clearly ‘been there and done it’ in his roles with Unilever. You can see Sam’s presentations here and his list of very useful and common sense ‘pitfalls’ are…
1. Be ready to give up control
2. The price of entry is nearly zero for everyone
3. Be ready to follow up
4. If there’s a backlash, join the conversation
5. Keep looking out for a groundswell
6. Don’t feel you have to own the community
7. Be authentic
8. Match the approach to the channel
9. Don’t use social media to duck legislation
10. Tidy up
His examples from Dove illustrated very well that people hate hypocrisy and ‘social media’ is a great way of the people letting hypocritical companies know. The examples are also great lessons for brand managers in that very worthy comments about the downsides of the beauty industry look highly hypocritical from a massive FMCG organisation who benefits greatly from such an industry and who also has some responsibilities for heavy damage to the environment.
I also enjoyed Theresa Regli’s common sense keynote presentation about ‘Findability in the Web 2.0 World’ and her tour along the Red line of CMS Watch’s Content Technology Vendor Map 2010
With its focus on knowledge management from a librarian’s perspective and the challenges of legal, technical and medical publishing, IMS has a solidity about it. I’ve noticed many vendors in the Online Information side of things coming and going over the last 10 years (probably in direct correlation to the hype cycle) so it remains a useful barometer of the broader information management space and will probably be a lot busier next year when the social media hype dies down 😉