Immediacy is dead, long live immediacy…

RIP_Immediacy2The publishing of the latest CMS Watch report brings with it the death of another notable CMS brand – Immediacy.

Although it has been slipping away over the last year or so following the acquisition by Alterian, the recent relaunch of the Alterian Content Manager website and the listing of the 42 products reviewed by CMS Watch has consigned the brand to CMS history once and for all.

In terms of the product itself, I’ll take a wager on Alterian CMC 6.2 (or Alterian corporate edition) being consigned to history too by the time the next CMS Watch report is published.

So this post is an obituary to an old friend who brought fulfillment to many but could, at times, be frustrating and hard work to live with.

Born as a product in its own right in 2001, or thereabouts, from some previous efforts of providing content management capabilities to customers of increasing size, Immediacy encapsulated a new breed of simpler content management systems focusing very strongly on ease of use.

If the founders had listened to analysts at that time, they probably wouldn’t have bothered starting a CMS product business, as the consensus at the turn of the century was that there were already far too many products trying to do the same or similar things and that the market wasn’t there for reinventing the wheel continually.

However, no-one told the potential customers that – and although the technology markets were reeling from the over-inflated expectations of the dotcom boom and the reality check that was the dotcom bust, many organisations themselves were just only starting to understand how to create and manage dynamic websites and the vast majority didn’t have the budgets or technical expertise to deploy the type of systems the big telcos and the Global 2000 were using at that time.

ImmediacyeditorI arrived at Immediacy from just that type of organisation, deploying just that type of system.  As the 10th employee joining the already crowded offices that were shared with a local taxi company it was quite a culture shock but also a breath of fresh air.

After several years spent navigating through the complex interfaces of systems such as Vignette, Oracle Portal and Documentum – Immediacy’s ‘Word like’, WYSIWYG Editor was a joy to work with. For a marketing person looking to build an engaging, effective, search engine friendly web presence, the emerging range of plug-in modules for things like menu building, form-building, email newsletter creation and user polls etc it was like a kid being let loose in a candy store in terms of the capabilities I now had at my fingertips. The sort of feelings I get using WordPress or Joomla for free these days.

It was clear that other organisations were starting to think the same. I remember particularly, interviewing a local council for a case study that is still being used here and recognising just what potential there was for an easy-to-use system that could be packaged to the particular needs of local authorities and then to extend that idea to other organisation groupings and organisational needs such as Intranet solutions and marketing suites. Credit to the Immediacy developers such as Simon here who made such things happen – and fast!

One of the things I remember most during my early days with Immediacy was describing the marketplace at that time as a ‘land grab’. The net result of which was an explosion in activity to take on as many partners as possible and get through the doors of as many organisations as possible (particularly local authorities). All credit to the formidable Immediacy sales team who traveled the length and breadth of the UK to grow the partner and customer base to a level where it had to be taken seriously by the industry commentators. The downside of going for quantity over quality of course is keeping pace with demand and focusing on high standards of delivery. In retrospect though I still believe it was the right time and place to make such moves.

Having subsequently spent a year implementing Immediacy for multiple websites and then returning to the company to help push forward product management and strategy, I learnt a lot about what were the customer pain points and top priorities for ongoing development and spent many hours understanding how and where Immediacy could be developed further to address usage scenarios beyond those seen as its core strengths. It’s at times like those that you recognise what CMS Watch are now describing as ‘complexity versus flexibility’ and how it is difficult to achieve one without the other. In reality, Immediacy was only going to achieve more complex scenarios and greater flexibility with a radical overhaul of its underlying architecture and that anything else was really going to be  in the words of the developers themselves as ‘hacks’ and ‘fudges’.  I understand that this was the type of decision taken by longer standing CMS providers such as EPiServer who re-wrote their original ElectroPost application substantially following the arrival of .Net.

I think it was the realisation that the lower tier of the content management arena was going to get even more crowded and that simpler Open Source solutions were going to become more widespread and popular that prompted the founders to drive for an exit strategy. I know they’ve debated themselves whether they did the right thing at the right time. Having seen the fallout from the global financial crisis that came after the Mediasurface acquisition and now recently  information about the latest CMS Watch report and the way they have re-categorised the market place I have to say I believe the Immediacy founders certainly did do the right thing at the right time.

To be honest, they only had the opportunity to do that by getting a lot of other things right in the proceeding years. That focus on trying to achieve the best possible user experience within the confines of earlier browsers was fundamental to the uptake of the product and I’d personally love to see a new generation of CMS developers take a radical view of the market and use the very latest Rich Internet capabilities to revolutionise the user experience once again with a laser sharp focus on productivity.

Although the essence of the product still remains for now, the Immediacy name is disappearing fast. Of all the Content Management product and company names around, Immediacy remains my favourite. In fact, when you look at how the market has evolved in recent years with the growth of social networking, user-generated content and increasingly mobile content then ‘immediacy’ is an even more relevant term for content creation and management than it was 10 years ago. Maybe Alterian will revive the name at some point for some product specific branding and we will see the Immediacy name rise again. Until then, goodbye old friend.

Is there a market for simpler proprietary CMS’s?…

Looking at information about the new CMS Watch report, it has the potential to become a watershed in the Industry. The re-classification of products into 5 new tiers  makes some significant statements about how the industry has been evolving.

My instant reaction to the re-classification was that it reflected my thoughts and experiences in recent years on a number of areas such as how Open Source and SaaS should no longer be segregated and how the middle tier categories in particular deserved more clarity and emphasis.

I’m sure there are vendors and practitioners the world over taking issue with certain aspects of the re-categorisation. Naturally, when you spend a lot of time developing and using these tools it is understandable that you create different ‘thought worlds’ based on your own field of reference and it’s sometimes difficult to step back from this and take different perspectives.

imm_alterian_logoI thought I’d throw a few observations into the mix based on my own field of reference. That reference is as a one-time product manager for Immediacy (Now Alterian CMC 6.2), an Immediacy customer and implementor, an ecommerce orientated Joomla implementation I have done on a personal project and being a customer and implementor of EPiServer over the last two years.

After careful consideration, the one aspect of the re-classification that I would take issue with is the positioning of Alterian CMC 6.2 alongside Joomla in the Simpler Products category.

Based on experiences of using Joomla quite deeply over the last year and a full understanding of Alterian CMC 6.2 (from background knowledge and studying the latest documentation and release notes on the Immediacy support site) I believe that the Alterian product sits more comfortably and relevantly in the Mid-Range Products category.

In my opinion, the investment and innovation made in 4 key areas of development separate the Alterian product from the Simpler range of products

  1. Web Asset Management ( a lighter-weight Document Management capability)
  2. Taxonomy and Categorisation
  3. SharePoint Connectivity
  4. Administration and Deployment Capability

I believe that these capabilities are of a sufficient maturity to provide a clear distinction between the capability of Joomla for example and the Alterian Corporate product and general awareness of the other products listed in the Simpler Products category also underlies my view on this.

The maturity of the former Immediacy Editor application, a broad range of plug-in solutions and the additional capabilities I’ve listed above make it a comparable, and in several areas, more capable solution to a number of products listed in the Mid-Range product categories. I would be very interested to hear, for example,  a justification for why GOSS in particular is categorised as having broader capability than Alterian CMC 6.2?

No doubt the Alterian acquisition has impacted the roadmap of the corporate product more so than other areas but I think that sufficient investment had been made prior to both the Mediasurface and Alterian acquisitions to justify CMC 6.2 being categorised as a Mid-Range product.

If indeed, the consensus is that Alterian CMC 6.2 is categorised correctly then I raise the question from this post’s title – Is there a market for simpler proprietary CMS’s? Will organisations be prepared to pay $10 – $20,000 for a proprietary licence when they can get an Open Source option for free or does the product maturity (documentation, install base, partner experience) and support that solution provides justify that level of investment?

Heard more than expected at EPiServer Day 09…

(Note:- For less of a general ramble and some informed and insightful technical commentary on latest EPiServer developments check out Jon On Tech here… )

Squeak, my faithful hearing aid, and I headed for the EPiServer Partner and Customer Day at the Cumberland Hotel yesterday. Squeak is a relatively new companion – the latest breed of digital aid with enhanced sound filtering and directional microphone control. However, on its last major outing with its twin brother Squeal, to a recent Michael McIntyre gig at the Anvil in Basingstoke, both let me down considerably when they had a major disagreement with the sound system, which led to an unbearable level of distortion and, sadly, a ruined evening. There’s nothing worse than sitting in a theatre full of hysterical laughter having not heard the joke – and particularly having to do it for 2 long hours. 

So – I’m pleased to report no such problems with the acoustics and sound system at The Cumberland – which were excellent – and meant that I heard every detail and also enjoyed the various conversations I had with previous and new acquaintances during the networking sessions. The only slightly disconcerting experience was being able to hear conversations several tables away during the lunch break and a realisation that I now possess an almost bionic superpower. That’s probably a bit of an exaggeration and is more than likely just restoring an ability I should have anyway – but it was an interesting surprise all the same.

CMO_BigScreen_2As with previous EPiServer events I’ve attended over the last couple of years, I sit in the audience listening to the information from two perspectives. The first as a customer, super administrator and web project manager and the second as a former competitor. Having spent some time developing CMS product strategies and helping drive forward CMS software developments I have deep respect and admiration for those who can listen to customers and partners to identify their pain points and product needs and can bring required changes and new developments to market quickly and effectively. Scanning the horizon, liaison with customers, articulating requirements and working with management and development teams to prioritise work and deliver high quality working software is the hardest and most frustrating role I have ever done and, picking up on my last post, could often be described as a ‘thankless task’.

Having used EPiServer CMS5 pretty intensely for almost 2 years now, it works in ways that I’ve long imagined this type of mid-market WCMS solution could and should work.  It’s an affordably packaged offering with the ability to handle multiple websites, microsites and landing pages in one seamless editing and administrative environment. Different ‘task based’ editing options  are available – from full in context WYSIWYG to an intuitive and dynamic editing interface which enables easy access to multiple country treeviews, page language controls and action windows. It also has sufficient and granular administrative control for more complex globalisation needs requiring access and permission control for a broad spectrum of users and capabilities.

It would appear that EPiServer has moved faster than many in a proprietary environment by remaining 100% channel focused and adopting all the best lessons and philosophies of the Open Source community. On balance it seems to have been more effective than many comparable proprietary vendors in opening up its code base and empowering development partners to create meaningful, useful and broadly viable product extensions.

So, watching Rikard Ljungman, EPiServer’s VP of Product Development, present their upcoming Marketing Arena offering and then listening to subsequent presentations giving more insight into EPiServer Community, I found myself recalling various product scope documentation and presentations from a few years’ back and thinking “that’s what I wanted the Marketing Solution to provide and that’s how I thought the Community tools should be integrated”. Obviously it’s easy to say this in retrospect and I had a real ‘kicking myself ‘ moment when I realised that much of the SEO capability EPiServer is launching is similar in many respects to the Accessibility Checking tools that were already well established in the product I was managing and could have been a relatively quick and easy win – if I’d been a lot smarter.

No doubt I’ll be accused of being an EPiServer ‘fan boy’ with these comments but I’ve been managing web projects of all shapes and sizes over quite a few years now with some of the biggest solutions around – to some of the smallest ones and quite a number in the mid-tier space in-between. I’ve been pretty demanding of the EPiServer product and its implementors and impressed with the flexibility and adaptability I’ve experienced in return – so this is simply giving credit where I believe it is due.

I’ve also fallen into the trap of being too enthusiastic and believing too much of the hype that often accompanies new developments – which  I’ve also been guilty of producing myself on occasions – so I’ve had my fingers burnt slightly and learnt a few lessons following the EPiServer events last year. Hopefully EPiServer has also learnt lessons in integrating its development partner’s work into its own branded product set and testing these upcoming new releases more thoroughly this time round 🙂

As with many activities and tools where you spend a fair amount of your working life, ‘familiarity can breed contempt’ and I think the real test for me will be EPiServer and its partner bases’ ability to recognise and address key pain points and bugs quickly. If developing the latest and greatest functionality comes at the expense of improving the core web content management capabilities that make for a reliable, productive and effective user experience, then EPiServer will risk turning off established and loyal customers who are its best advocates and often help to do the marketing job for them.

A thankless task…

If you’ve read my last few posts I guess it would be easy to get the impression that I believe managing an organisation’s global web presence is a thankless task sometimes. True, it has it’s challenges but I remain as passionate as ever about driving forward this type of project and as convinced as ever about its core importance to many organisation’s operations, particularly product manufacturers who have a lot to gain by getting web challenges right.

My train journey to London yesterday illustrated a truly thankless task for which I really would not want to be responsible – namely combating trackside graffiti.

Earlier this year I did the London journey a number of times for work related reasons and was quite encouraged by the fact there was a noticeable absence of graffiti in the usual blackspots such as Wimbledon. What I didn’t realise is that ever year Merton Council, together with Network Rail, has a blitz on trackside graffiti prior to the Tennis Championships. Presumably legions of staff are dispatched with many thousands of litres of that delightful shade of brown paint to cover over the spray-paint scrawls on mile after mile of brickwork and trackside infrastructure.

Judging by yesterday’s trackside display however it seems that all they’ve achieved in this year’s operation is to create a lovely fresh backdrop for an explosion of new tags – with nice brilliant white and silver spray-paint clearly being in vogue.

ugly_graffitiThere is graffiti art that I like and graffiti art (like the Banksy stuff) that is very clever and thought provoking – but what I saw yesterday is mindless, ugly and blatant vandalism. It is an insidious mess that blights the environment that people have to live in and really does raise questions about standards in our society and the way we are creating younger generations, dangerously immersed in gang culture, that see themselves as untouchable and above the law.

I feel for the managers and staff responsible for the annual and regular clean-up operations. It really does seem like a genuinely thankless task for which there seem very few easy answers. It can only really be addressed with wider participation of society, education to undermine gang culture influences and greater efforts by parents in particular to take more responsibility for what their offspring are up to in and around their neighbourhoods.

Can't see the sun for the contrails…

contrailI set off for London at an early hour this morning. The air had a crisp autumn bite. As the train headed north of Basingstoke and the sun rose above the low lying mist in the fields a striking criss-cross matrix of contrails became increasingly visible across the skyline – some from planes that had long since left UK airspace or landed at the big London airports and a load more from planes still in view. At one point I counted 10 aircraft at varying altitudes adding their fresh white trails to the blue canvas.

Aside from being a reminder of just how busy the skies are above us, particularly in the South East of England, it was also an illustration of how issues around climate change are not as straightforward as sometimes thought. On my way home this evening I read a couple of articles concerning climate change and air travel, both of which were calling for a dramatic cut in the number of flights in and out of the UK to reduce carbon emissions. This reminded me of some research that was conducted following the 9/11 terrorist attacks when the entire US fleet was grounded for several days.

Observers at the time said how abnormally clear and bright the sky seemed over the US during those days and those monitoring atmospheric temperatures noticed a sudden and dramatic rise across the US not seen in research before. It became apparent that contrails and air particles associated with air travel and long suspected as being a large contributing factor in global dimming were doing more than imagined to keep the opposite effects of global warming at bay.